Notice to Clerk of Court and Public Memorial

Your Honor, I Travante-TyVaun of the House of Tucker stand before this court, under God, to bear witness to my unalienable rights secured by the Constitution of the United States. I am here to respectfully assert that the recent order issued by the magistrate judge, denying my motion for forma pauperis and attempting to bar my entry into the courtroom, contravenes fundamental constitutional principles, the supremacy of the law, and my rights as a sovereign individual under God and the Constitution.

Exercise of Constitutional Rights: I exercise my First Amendment right to petition this court for relief without undue financial burden, recognizing that this right is fundamental and protected by the Constitution. As a national, I invoke the Full Faith and Credit Clause, which mandates that all states honor the judicial proceedings and legal acts of other states, reaffirming my right to access courts and seek justice without unlawful impediments.

The Supremacy of the Constitution Under Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution—the Supremacy Clause—the Constitution is the "supreme Law of the Land." All laws, statutes, court rules, and policies inconsistent with the Constitution are null and void. When a court enforces a fee, rule, or regulation that infringes upon constitutional rights—such as access to justice, due process, or free speech—that enforcement is inherently unconstitutional.

The oath taken by every judge, including this magistrate, to "support and defend the Constitution" obligates adherence to this supreme law above all other statutes or policies.

Judicial Authority and Constitutional Oath: A judge's oath binds them to uphold the Constitution, not to enforce unlawful rules. When a court imposes barriers—whether fees or procedural hurdles—that deny access to the courts or violate constitutional protections, the judge is operating outside their lawful authority, potentially engaging in treason against the Constitution and the American people. The principle of judicial review, established in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), affirms that courts have the duty to declare laws and rules unconstitutional when they conflict with the Constitution.

Legal Precedents Supporting Access and Rights

In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 141 (1891): Emphasized the importance of access to the courts, affirming that without it, constitutional rights are meaningless.

Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971): Recognized that access to courts is a fundamental right protected by Due Process Clause and cannot be denied solely due to inability to pay court fees.

Sansmo v. New York, 414 U.S. 807 (1973): Reinforced that courts cannot impose unreasonable barriers where constitutional rights are at stake.

Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287 (1942): Affirmed the Full Faith and Credit Clause's requirement for states to recognize the validity of judicial proceedings of other states.

California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109 (1972): Clarified that the Full Faith and Credit Clause applies to judicial records and proceedings.

Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980): Confirmed courts' duty to uphold constitutional protections, including due process rights.

Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976): Outlined due process principles, including notice and opportunity to be heard, foundational to the right to petition.

Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994): Emphasized judges' duty to remain impartial and uphold judicial integrity.

Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927): Addressed the duty of fairness and impartiality in judicial proceedings.

United States v. Ritchie, 342 U.S. 90 (1951): Highlighted fiduciary obligations in judicial functions, emphasizing acting in the best interests of justice.

Conclusion and Call for Justice In the name of God, I declare that any rule, fee, or statute that denies or impairs my constitutionally protected right to access the courts is invalid, unlawful, and unconstitutional. I call upon this honorable court to uphold the oath to support and defend the Constitution, to recognize the supremacy of the law, and to administer justice fairly and in accordance with the principles enshrined in our founding documents.

May justice be served under the divine guidance of truth and righteousness.